lasik surgeons

 

USAEyes is a nonprofit Lasik patient advocacy organization
How to Pick
A Lasik Doctor
۰ Certified Lasik Doctor
۰ Why Choose USAEyes
 
Certified Lasik Doctors
۰ 50 Tough Questions For
  Your Lasik Doctor
 
Ask Lasik Expert
۰ Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
۰ Lasik Results
۰ All About Lasik
۰ Lasik Cost
۰ Wavefront Custom Lasik
۰ Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
۰ Monovision Lasik
۰ PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
۰ RLE Lens Exchange
 

Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Bookmark, etc. this page.

Add Lasik page to Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, My Favorites, Facebook, Ask, and others.

 

Lasik Doctors

 

Central Islands

Causes, treatment, and how to avoid central islands after Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, CK, RLE, and P-IOL


Central Islands are a complication of excimer laser assisted refractive surgery when the laser fails to remove a portion of cornea. A central island is exactly what it sounds like, a small island of raised tissue in the center of the cornea. This bump in the cornea causes light passing through it to bend erratically and creates very poor vision. If one views the concave area of the ablation zone like the bottom of a lake, one can imagine an island sticking up in the center.

Visual symptoms with central islands are typically monocular diplopia or distortion. Central islands only occur with conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik excimer laser assisted procedures. Central islands can not occur with lens based refractive surgery procedures like RLE and P-IOL, nor can they occur with Intacs.

Central islands are quite rare with current techniques and technology. Central islands tend to occur more often with a broadband beam type laser and a conventional ablation (not wavefront-guided). These days about the only cause of a central island is the use of broadbeam lasers or something like water or oil getting on the corneal bed just before the laser treatment.

The best way for a patient to avoid a central island is select a laser that uses a flying spot technology, not broadbeam technology. Keeping the treatment bed absent of impurities is the doctor's responsibility, so selecting an evaluated doctor or evaluating a doctor yourself is always wise.

A central island is not a desirable complication...not that there are any that are actually desirable...with slow recovery and additional treatment necessary. There are many options available and resolution of some degree is highly likely.

The first and least invasive technique for central island resolution is the use of contact lenses. If the central island is shallow, soft contacts may do the trick. If the islands are significantly elevated, a Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) contact lens may be the better choice. This type of lens will "smash down" the island and make a more uniform surface. If there is no refractive error other than the central island, RGPs without correction are available.

A technique that may be appropriate to resolve central islands is called CLAPIKS. We have a detailed article on CLAPIKS including a downloadable white paper for your doctor to review. This is an advanced use of contact lenses and topical eye drops to reshape the cornea.

A patient with central islands should proceed carefully with any additional laser treatment. At least, laser treatment in the conventional sense. Wavefront diagnosis is usually dreadful with central islands. A central island is a topography issue, not one of higher order aberrations which wavefront excels at resolving. A topography based laser treatment for resolution of central islands is Custom Contoured Ablation Pattern (C-CAP).

C-CAP is the customization of laser vision correction treatments for central islands and similar corneal aberrations. The FDA has approved the use of C-CAP method with an excimer laser under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). Procedures under a HDE are medical procedures specially designated by the FDA for the treatment of fewer than 4000 patients per year with rare medical conditions.

C-CAP uses a liquid material that is applied to the outside of the eye. In some cases, a contact lens is applied over the liquid to give a smooth surface. The liquid becomes more firm, and the contact (if used) is removed. A broadbeam laser applies energy to the entire treatment area with each pulse. The liquid ablates at the same rate as corneal tissue. As the laser removes tissue or the liquid, the high areas of the cornea are exposed and ablated down to the low areas. C-CAP has been shown to resolve many topographical imperfections caused by disease, trauma, or surgery.

Before you a patient with a central island considers any surgery of any kind, it is very highly recommend that the opinion of a corneal specialist, preferably one who is affiliated with a nearby teaching hospital, is attained. A teaching hospital will provide the greatest amount of resources available, and the second opinion will provide an affirmation that the proposed corrective procedure is appropriate, and the peace of mind that the patient is on the right path to recovery.

Recommendations for patients with central islands are:

1) Get a second opinion from a corneal specialist.
2) Get a pair of contacts, soft or RGP as required.
3) Discuss CLAPIKS with your doctor
4) Evaluate C-CAP or similar topography-based procedures

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, NearVision CK, RLE, or any refractive surgery procedure, we highly recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Laser Eye Surgery Doctor.

If this article did not fully answer your questions, use our free Ask Lasik Expert patient forum.


Current Central Island Medical Journal News...

Corneal flap assessment with Rondo microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Related Articles

Corneal flap assessment with Rondo microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun 25;

Authors: Paschalis EI, Aristeidou AP, Foudoulakis NC, Razis LA

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with Rondo, Wavelight AG microkeratome and to examine factors that can influence flap thickness (FT). SETTING: The study took place at the Laser & Ophthalmos Eye Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty eyes from 180 patients underwent LASIK with Rondo microkeratome. Three surgeons (A, B and C) performed all surgeries with no previous experience of Rondo microkeratome. All patients were treated with the 130 mum plate. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and stromal bed thickness were measured by Scheimpflug and ultrasound pachymetry. Right eye (OD) was treated first. RESULTS: Mean FT for OD: 120 +/- 19 mum (range 69-158 mum); for left eye (OS): 106 +/- 17 mum (range 70-147 mum). Flaps in OD were significantly thicker than in OS (p < 0.001). FT was significantly correlated to the keratometric reading (K): r = 0.121; p = 0.02. No correlation was found between FT and CCT or between FT and the attempted refractive correction (SE) (p > 0.14). Mean FT was significantly lower than the manufacturer's 130 mum specification (Mean FT = 113 +/- 19 mum; p < 0.001). FT between surgeons A, B and C was significantly different (analysis of variance between surgeons; p < 0.001). Scheimpflug and ultrasound CCT measurements were significantly correlated (r = 0.921; p < 0.001) with ultrasound measuring an average 4.5 mum higher than Scheimpflug (CCT (Oculyzer) = 553.96 +/- 27 mum; CCT (Ultrasound) = 558.45 +/- 28 mum). Mean flap diameter was 9.2 +/- 0.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: FT with Rondo microkeratome was significantly influenced by the mean preoperative K reading. First treated eye was significantly thicker than the fellow left eye, while both were significantly lower than the recommended 130 mum thickness. Gaining basic experience of Rondo microkeratome required an average of 90 flaps/surgeon.

PMID: 20577755 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

 

Technorati Tags:

Last updated Monday, April 12, 2010

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :

Materials presented in this website are for informational purposes only and are not medical advice. See full Terms of Use.
Unless otherwise indicated, Copyright 1997-2010 © Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization.
8543 Everglade Drive, Sacramento CA 95826-3616, USA, 800/USA-Eyes
No images, graphics, or text may be reproduced in any media without express written permission.
USAEyes, CRSQA, ComplicatedEyes, Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance,
50 Tough Questions For Your Lasik Doctor, and Consider and Choose With Confidence are trademarks of the
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
All Rights Reserved.