lasik surgeons

 

USAEyes is a nonprofit Lasik patient advocacy organization
How to Pick
A Lasik Doctor
۰ Certified Lasik Doctor
۰ Why Choose USAEyes
 
Certified Lasik Doctors
۰ 50 Tough Questions For
  Your Lasik Doctor
 
Ask Lasik Expert
۰ Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
۰ Lasik Results
۰ All About Lasik
۰ Lasik Cost
۰ Wavefront Custom Lasik
۰ Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
۰ Monovision Lasik
۰ PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
۰ RLE Lens Exchange
 

Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Bookmark, etc. this page.

Add Lasik page to Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, My Favorites, Facebook, Ask, and others.

 

Lasik Doctors

 

Appropriate Age For Lasik...

...All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, CK, P-IOL, RLE, etc.


lasik Each generation has different needs and Lasik is not always the best choice.

 

There are different issues for the very young, young, middle age, and advanced age that must be considered before having conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, RLE, P-IOLs or other refractive surgery procedure.

Pediatric Lasik

The FDA approved the excimer laser for patientsover the age of 18, however it is possible for someone under 18 to have surgery. This would be an off-label use of the medical device and would be legal if a doctor determined Lasik would be appropriate. Pediatric Lasik has been used only in extreme cases where vision is threatened by ambylopia or other serious sight threatening situation because of severe refractive error. Do not expect a doctor to wave this age requirement easily.

Young Age

Although 18 is the minimum age for most situations, the chronological age is not really the important point. In all cases, the eyes must be stable. No matter how old you are, your prescription needs to have been without change for at least two years. The most popular technique for this age is Lasik, with the laser eye surgery techniques of PRK, LASEK and Epi-Lasik for specific circumstances. If the patient has very high refractive error or very thin corneas, a phakic intraocular lens lens (P-IOL) may be appropriate.

Middle Age

As we approach age 40, the natural lens of the eye has greater difficulty changing focus. This is called presbyopia. It is possible that someone in their late 30's and early 40's is able to see close (reading) and far (horizon) but could lose this ability after refractive surgery. You may want to read about Sudden Presbyopia. There is no predictable, safe, and reliable surgical method to correct presbyopia, however some people find acceptable workaround techniques including monovision. Monovision can be induced with contact lenses, Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, and NearVision CK.

Advanced Age

As we get closer to our 60's it is possible cataracts will become a concern. If cataracts need to be removed, then refractive surgery may not be a good idea and the cataract surgery can take care of most refractive error. In fact, some people elect to have cataract surgery for purely refractive purposes. This is called RLE. If the natural lens is clear and healthy, then Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, P-IOLs are all possibly appropriate techniques.

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, NearVision CK, RLE, or any refractive surgery procedure, we highly recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Laser Eye Surgeon.


Current Lasik Age Medical Journal News...

Evaluation of a Risk Factor Scoring System for Corneal Ectasia After LASIK.

Related Articles

Evaluation of a Risk Factor Scoring System for Corneal Ectasia After LASIK.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb 25;:1-10

Authors: Binder PS, Trattler WB

PURPOSE:To assess a previously published risk score system for predicting postoperative LASIK ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. METHODS:A retrospective review of one surgeon's LASIK database was performed for eyes with Randleman ectasia risk scores based on patient age <30 years, pre-operative central corneal thickness <510 mum, residual stromal bed thickness <300 mum, and/or a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent >-8.00 diopters that had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS:Of 1702 eyes with myopic errors and normal topographies, 35 (2.0%) eyes had a combined risk score between 5 and 9 points, 92 (5.4%) eyes had a combined risk score of 4 or higher, and 208 (12.2%) eyes had a combined score of 3 or higher. None of these eyes developed ectasia whereas 3 eyes with preoperative topographic keratoconus with no other risk factors developed ectasia. CONCLUSIONS:The current risk score system would have eliminated 5.4% of eyes with 4 or more points from LASIK surgery, and would have also required the surgeon to advise an additional 6.8% of eyes with a score of 3 that they were at "moderate risk" and should "proceed with caution." In eyes with normal preoperative topographies, the scoring system may not accurately predict whether patients are at increased risk for developing postoperative LASIK ectasia.

PMID: 20166627 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


Technorati Tags:

Last updated Thursday, February 25, 2010

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :

Materials presented in this website are for informational purposes only and are not medical advice. See full Terms of Use.
Unless otherwise indicated, Copyright 1997-2010 © Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization.
8543 Everglade Drive, Sacramento CA 95826-3616, USA, 800/USA-Eyes
No images, graphics, or text may be reproduced in any media without express written permission.
USAEyes, CRSQA, ComplicatedEyes, Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance,
50 Tough Questions For Your Lasik Doctor, and Consider and Choose With Confidence are trademarks of the
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
All Rights Reserved.