lasik surgeons

 

USAEyes is a nonprofit Lasik patient advocacy organization
USAEyes in the news!
 
How to Pick
A Lasik Doctor
۰ Certified Lasik Doctor
۰ Why Choose USAEyes
 
Certified Lasik Doctors
۰ 50 Tough Questions For
  Your Lasik Doctor
 
Ask Lasik Expert
۰ Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
۰ Lasik Results
۰ All About Lasik
۰ Lasik Cost
۰ Wavefront Custom Lasik
۰ Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
۰ Monovision Lasik
۰ PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
۰ RLE Lens Exchange
 

Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Bookmark, etc. this page.

Add Lasik page to Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, My Favorites, Facebook, Ask, and others.

 

Lasik Doctors

 

Overcorrection - Unexpected, Unwanted, Desired, and Planned

Relation with Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, CK, RLE, and P-IOL overcorrection.


lasik
Overcorrection is when the targeted correction is missed, sometimes deliberately.

 

Overcorrection is when refractive surgery such as conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, CK, RLE, or P-IOL, has changed the refractive errorr more than desired.

If an overcorrected patient was myopic (nearsighted, shortsighted) before surgery and the target was plano (no refractive error), then the patient would now be hyperopic (farsighted, longsighted). If the patient was hyperopic, the patient would be myopic if overcorrected. Overcorrection is normally undesired and unexpected, however in some instances overcorrection may be planned.

Overcorrection For Monovision

Overcorrection may be desired if the patient seeks monovision correction and was originally hyperopic. Monovision is generally when one eye is made myopic for near vision and the other eye is plano for distance vision. Monovision can be attained with contact lenses or refractive surgery. In this circumstance, the hyperopic patient would deliberately have one eye overcorrected into myopia to attain the monovision effect. If the patient is myopic before surgery, either no correction will be attempted in one eye, or the eye for near vision will be undercorrected. For details read Monovision Surgery Information

Overcorrection for Expected Regression

Deliberate overcorrection may be used to resolve expected regression. The cornea tends to regress back toward the original refractive error after cornea-based refractive surgery procedures Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik and CK. During healing, both the epithelium and the deeper stroma can reshape and reform at different rates, which may cause regression. This occurs mostly in myopic patients who have more than 6.0 diopters of refractive error and virtually all hyperopic patients. Depending upon the individual circumstances and the technique used for correction, hyperopic patients tend to regress significantly. For details read Lasik Regression Information

The patient may be deliberately overcorrected with the expectation that regression will bring the patient back to the desired correction.

Overcorrection for CK Regression

CK is considered a temporary correction because CK regresses over a period of years until all induced changes have dissipated. Because of full regression, deliberate minor overcorrection may be desired to maintain vision advantages for a longer period of time. For more details see CK Information

Conventional vs. Custom Wavefront-Guided Ablation

There may be some difference in regression rates between conventional and custom wavefront-guided excimer laser ablations. Wavefront-guided ablations tend to remove more tissue to achieve the same refractive change than conventional ablations. A greater amount of tissue removal may cause more regression if the patient requires a large amount of change. A doctor may slightly induce overcorrection to accommodate expected regression due to a deep ablation necessary for wavefront-guided ablation.

Overcorrection with Custom Wavefront-Guided Ablation

Anecdotal information indicates that individuals with very low (less than about 2.00 diopters) myopia tend to be overcorrected when wavefront-guided ablation is used. Also, if the wavefront aberrometer is not able to gain a clear evaluation of the patient's optics, overcorrection may occur. Laser manufacturers are responding to this situation with new algorithms for the computer that guides the laser, and doctors develop customized nomograms based upon prior experience. See Custom Wavefront Ablation

Overcorrection with Lens-Based Techniques RLE and P-IOLs

Overcorrection with the lens-based techniques RLE and P-IOLs is very different than overcorrection with a cornea-based technique like Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, or Eip-Lasik. After the healing period, RLE and P-IOL do not regress and the overcorrection is permanent. Except for monovision purposes, lens-based overcorrection means that the calculations used to determine the required lens power were not correct.

The response to lens-based overcorrection tends to be the use of glasses or contact lenses, removal of the implanted lens and replacement with a new lens of a different power, or the use of a cornea-based surgery technique like Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, or Epi-Lasik to "fine tune" the correction. See Refractive Lens Exchange Information or  Phakic Intraocular Lens Information

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, NearVision CK, RLE, or any refractive surgery procedure, we highly recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Laser Eye Surgery Doctor.

If this article did not fully answer your questions, use our free Ask Lasik Expert patient forum.


Current Lasik Overcorrection Medical Journal News...

Laser in situ keratomileusis buttonhole: classification and management algorithm.

Related Articles

Laser in situ keratomileusis buttonhole: classification and management algorithm.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1892-9

Authors: Harissi-Dagher M, Todani A, Melki SA

PURPOSE: To report the classification, management, and visual outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap buttonhole caused by a microkeratome cut. SETTING: Private practice, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. METHODS: This retrospective observational case series comprised 15 patients with an intraoperative LASIK flap buttonhole or near buttonhole. In all cases, the flap was left in place or repositioned without excimer laser treatment. Buttonholes were classified by stage, and a treatment algorithm based on the stage was devised to determine the timing and type of intervention. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications associated with the laser vision correction surgery were reported. RESULTS: Postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 week to 23 months. All 9 patients who were retreated had a postoperative UCVA of 20/25 or better. No retreated patient lost BSCVA. Before retreatment, the median UCVA was 20/80 (range 20/40(-1) to counting fingers), the median BSCVA was 20/20(-2) (range 20/15(-1) to 20/70), and the spherical equivalent (SE) refractive errors ranged from -1.00 to -6.62 diopters (D). After retreatment, the median UCVA was 20/20(-2) (range 20/15(-1) to 20/25(-1)), the median BSCVA was 20/20 (range 20/15 to 20/20(-3)), and the SE refractive errors ranged from +0.50 to -0.75 D. Complications after laser correction treatment included overcorrection in 3 patients and corneal haze in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Classification of buttonholes was helpful in guiding treatment. Good UCVA and BSCVA were achieved by following a simple treatment algorithm based on surface ablation.

PMID: 19006735 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

Technorati Tags:

Last updated Monday, June 22, 2009

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :

Materials presented in this website are for informational purposes only and are not medical advice. See full Terms of Use.
Unless otherwise indicated, Copyright 1997-2009 © Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization.
8543 Everglade Drive, Sacramento CA 95826-3616, USA, 800/USA-Eyes
No images, graphics, or text may be reproduced in any media without express written permission.
USAEyes, CRSQA, ComplicatedEyes, Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance,
50 Tough Questions For Your Lasik Doctor, and Consider and Choose With Confidence are trademarks of the
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
All Rights Reserved.