USAEyes Lasik grant application.
 
How to Choose
A Lasik Doctor
Find Certified Surgeon
50 Tough Lasik Questions
 
Ask Lasik Expert
Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
What is Lasik?
Lasik Cost
Lasik Results
Wavefront Custom iLasik
Bladeless Lasik
Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
Monovision Lasik
PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
RLE Lens Exchange
 
Lasik Groupon
$1,500 Off Lasik
 
 

Image of Lasik doctors certification logo.

 
 
This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.   The USAEyes.org website complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
 
 

Overcorrection - Unexpected, Unwanted, Desired, and Planned

Relation with Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, RLE, and P-IOL overcorrection.


Image of woman holding magnifying glass to one eye causing the eye to appear large.  
Overcorrection is when the targeted correction is missed, sometimes deliberately.  
   

Overcorrection is when refractive surgery such as conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, RLE, or P-IOL, has changed the refractive error more than desired.

If an overcorrected patient was myopic (nearsighted, shortsighted) before surgery and the target was plano (no refractive error), then the patient would now be hyperopic (farsighted, longsighted). If the patient was hyperopic, the patient would be myopic if overcorrected. Overcorrection is normally undesired and unexpected, however in some instances overcorrection may be planned.

Overcorrection For Monovision

Overcorrection may be desired if the patient seeks monovision correction and was originally hyperopic. Monovision is generally when one eye is made myopic for near vision and the other eye is plano for distance vision. Monovision can be attained with contact lenses or refractive surgery. In this circumstance, the hyperopic patient would deliberately have one eye overcorrected into myopia to attain the monovision effect. If the patient is myopic before surgery, either no correction will be attempted in one eye, or the eye for near vision will be undercorrected. For details read Monovision information.

Overcorrection for Expected Regression

Deliberate overcorrection may be used to resolve expected regression. The cornea tends to regress back toward the original refractive error after cornea-based refractive surgery procedures Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik and CK. During healing, both the epithelium and the deeper stroma can reshape and reform at different rates, which may cause regression. This occurs mostly in myopic patients who have more than 6.0 diopters of refractive error and virtually all hyperopic patients. Depending upon the individual circumstances and the technique used for correction, hyperopic patients tend to regress significantly. For details read Lasik Regression information.

The patient may be deliberately overcorrected with the expectation that regression will bring the patient back to the desired correction.

Conventional vs. Custom Wavefront-Guided Ablation

There may be some difference in regression rates between conventional and custom wavefront-guided excimer laser ablations. Wavefront-guided ablations tend to remove more tissue to achieve the same refractive change than conventional ablations. A greater amount of tissue removal may cause more regression if the patient requires a large amount of change. A doctor may slightly induce overcorrection to accommodate expected regression due to a deep ablation necessary for wavefront-guided ablation.

Overcorrection with Custom Wavefront-Guided Ablation

Anecdotal information indicates that individuals with very low (less than about 2.00 diopters) myopia tend to be overcorrected when wavefront-guided ablation is used. Also, if the wavefront aberrometer is not able to gain a clear evaluation of the patient's optics, overcorrection may occur. Laser manufacturers are responding to this situation with new algorithms for the computer that guides the laser, and doctors develop customized nomograms based upon prior experience. See Custom Wavefront Ablation

Overcorrection with Lens-Based Techniques RLE and P-IOLs

Overcorrection with the lens-based techniques RLE and P-IOLs is very different than overcorrection with a cornea-based technique like Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, or Epi-Lasik. After the healing period, RLE and P-IOL do not regress and the overcorrection is permanent. Except for monovision purposes, lens-based overcorrection means that the calculations used to determine the required lens power were not correct.

The response to lens-based overcorrection tends to be the use of glasses or contact lenses, removal of the implanted lens and replacement with a new lens of a different power, or the use of a cornea-based surgery technique like Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, or Epi-Lasik to "fine tune" the correction.

Looking For Best Lasik Surgeon?

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, or any refractive surgery procedure, we recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Doctor.

Personalized Answers

If this article did not fully answer your questions, use our free Ask Lasik Expert patient forum.


Recent Lasik Overcorrection Medical Journal Articles...

Related Articles

Efficacy and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis for low astigmatism of 0.75 diopter or less.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;39(3):366-77

Authors: Frings A, Katz T, Richard G, Druchkiv V, Linke SJ

Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the refractive and visual outcomes of wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in myopic eyes with low astigmatism of 0.75 diopter (D) or less.
SETTING: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, and Care Vision private clinics, Germany and Austria.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis.
METHODS: This study comprised consecutive myopic patients with a preoperative refractive cylinder of 0.75 D or less and a preoperative subjective sphere between -2.75 D and -11.50 D. Three subgroups were formed based on preoperative refractive cylinder magnitude (0.25 D, 0.50 D, and 0.75 D). Manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. The astigmatic changes were determined using Alpins vector analysis.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 448 eyes of 448 patients (145 men, 303 women; mean age at surgery 37.8 years ± 9.4 [SD]). By 4 months (mean 116.8 ± 27.7 days) postoperatively, the mean UDVA was 0.10 ± 0.13 logMAR and the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) -0.05 ± 0.68 D. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy or safety between the preoperative cylinder groups. Astigmatic overcorrection for a preoperative cylinder of 0.25 D and 0.50 D was suggested by the correction index, the magnitude of error, the index of success, and the flattening index.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean UDVA and mean MRSE obtained by the 4-month follow-up were appropriate, a preoperative cylinder of 0.50 D or less was significantly overcorrected. Accordingly, caution should be used when considering full astigmatic correction for manifest cylinder of 0.50 D or less.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Mr. Frings was supported by a grant from Wavelight GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PMID: 23506918 [PubMed - in process]

 


Last updated

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :