lasik surgeons

 

USAEyes is a nonprofit Lasik patient advocacy organization
USAEyes in the news!
 
How to Pick
A Lasik Doctor
۰ Certified Lasik Doctor
۰ Why Choose USAEyes
 
Certified Lasik Doctors
۰ 50 Tough Questions For
  Your Lasik Doctor
 
Ask Lasik Expert
۰ Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
۰ Lasik Results
۰ All About Lasik
۰ Lasik Cost
۰ Wavefront Custom Lasik
۰ Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
۰ Monovision Lasik
۰ PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
۰ RLE Lens Exchange
 

Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Bookmark, etc. this page.

Add Lasik page to Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, My Favorites, Facebook, Ask, and others.

 

Lasik Doctors

 

Astigmatism Correction

Issues with Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, P-IOL, RLE, CK, etc.


lasik
Astigmatism means the cornea is not spherical, like the top of a ball, but is elliptical, like the back of a spoon. Astigmatism is a corneal irregularity that causes multiple focal points and distorts vision.

 

Conventional or custom wavefront  Lasik All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, and CK can correct astigmatism. Most refractive surgeons consider it much more difficult to correct astigmatism than myopia (nearsighted, shortsighted) or hyperopia (farsighted, longsighted). As a very general rule, if your astigmatism is more than half your sphere, then the probably of a good outcome is diminished. If your astigmatism is more than 2.00 diopters, your probably of a good outcome is significantly diminished.

Lens Based Limitations

Lens based refractive surgery procedures like P-IOL and RLE do not correct astigmatism well, however RLE can correct lenticular astigmatism. Although toric intraocular lenses (IOL) are available, placement and rotation issues make astigmatic correction difficult.

The amount and type of astigmatism that can be corrected will depend upon many factors. Lasers are approved by the FDA for specific levels of astigmatic correction. We have a laser specification table that can show you exactly what degree of astigmatic correction - if any - a laser is approved to perform. More than the laser, the physiological features of your eye will determine if your astigmatism can be corrected with refractive surgery. Issues such as thickness of cornea, pupil size, plus type and amount of astigmatism will all be important considerations.

Indirectly Correct Astigmatism

CK, P-IOL, and RLE do not directly correct astigmatism, however a minor amount of astigmatism can be corrected as a part of the surgical process of correcting myopia or hyperopia. CK can position the spots of radiofrequency energy to correct a small amount of astigmatism. P-IOLs available in the US do not correct astigmatism, but the incision through which the P-IOL is placed inside the eye can be manipulated to reduce preexisting astigmatism. Equally, the incision created during RLE through which the IOL is placed inside the eye can be manipulated to reduce preexisting astigmatism.

Laser Coupling Effect

Something important to remember is that with most laser assisted astigmatic refractive surgery techniques, for each diopter of astigmatism that is corrected, a certain amount of myopia is also automatically corrected - even if you don't need the myopia correction. This coupling of myopic correction and astigmatic correction is consistent with virtually all excimer lasers.

As an example, let us assume that for every one diopter of astigmatic correction the technique also corrects 0.25 diopter of myopia. If you have 2.00 diopters of astigmatism, you will receive 0.50 diopters of myopia correction (0.25 diopters of automatic myopia correction multiplied by the 2.00 diopters of astigmatism to be corrected) even if you do not need the myopia correction. If you have more than 0.50 diopters of myopia, a 2.00 diopter astigmatic correction should not be a problem with this technique. If you are plano then after surgery you would be 0.50 diopters hyperopic - not a desirable outcome.

Different Astigmatism Types

Irregular astigmatism is very, very difficult to correct and some techniques and technology cannot fully correct an irregular astigmatism at this time. Every person with irregular astigmatism is unique and needs to be individually evaluated.

Lenticular astigmatism is when the irregularity is in the natural crystalline lens, rather than in the cornea. RLE will eliminate lenticular astigmatism. Cornea-based surgery techniques conventional and wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, and Epi-Lasik can correct lenticular astigmatism's effects, but making a reverse of the lenticular astigmatism in the cornea. While this can be a successful technique of lenticular astigmatism correction, there is a significant concern.

As we age the natural lens of the eye becomes clouded. This is called a cataract. The process to resolve a cataract is to remove the natural lens and replace it with an artificial lens. The problem is that the artificial lens will not have the pre-existing lenticular astigmatism and if the cornea has been reshaped to accommodate the lenticular astigmatism, the cornea will now cause an irregular astigmatism.

Discuss in detail with your doctor the type and amount of astigmatism you have and how it may be accommodated with refractive surgery. Discuss if the technology and techniques s/he intends to use may affect myopic correction and how this may be accommodated for your individual needs.

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, All-Laser Lasik, PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik, NearVision CK, RLE, or any refractive surgery procedure, we highly recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Laser Eye Surgeon.


Current Astigmatism Lasik Medical Journal News...

Pachymetric ratio no-history method for intraocular lens power adjustment after excimer laser refractive surgery.

Related Articles

Pachymetric ratio no-history method for intraocular lens power adjustment after excimer laser refractive surgery.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1057-66

Authors: Geggel HS

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new pachymetric method not requiring pre-refractive surgical data for adjusting the intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes undergoing cataract surgery after excimer laser refractive surgery and comparing final refractive results with previously published formulas or methods. DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six eyes from 23 patients who had uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery after previous myopic (35) or mixed astigmatism (1) excimer laser photoablation. METHODS: A new corneal ratio (Geggel ratio) method was developed to estimate the diopters (D) of previous excimer treatment or change in spherical equivalent (SE) at the corneal plane. A regression formula, 0.40 (|DeltaSE|-1), predicted the correction factor to be added to the SRK/T (Sanders, Retzlaff, Kraff) formula. The IOL results from the Geggel and Geggel-real (modified for mild myopia) method were compared with the Masket, Koch double K table, Ladas, Walter, modified Maloney, clinical history, Feiz standardized and nomogram, Latkany average and flat, Ferrara, Rosa, Savini, Jin, Shammas no-history and regression formula, Seitz, and Awwad methods. The SRK/T, Hoffer, and Holladay formulas were tested in appropriate formulas. All IOL powers were converted to refractive results using IOL(exact) equations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean +/- standard deviation (SD), range, absolute mean +/- SD, and percent within +/-0.5 D, +/-1.0 D, and -1.0/+0.5 D. RESULTS: The pachymetric technique minimizes hyperopic surprises with 92% of eyes within -1.0/+0.5 D and no overcorrections >0.5 D with the Geggel-real modification. Final refractive results with the Geggel, Geggel-real, Masket, Koch double K tables, Latkany average and flat, Savini, Shammas no-history, Seitz Holladay, Seitz Hoffer, and Awwad Hoffer all had >55% SE +/-0.5 D and >85% SE +/-1.0 D of the surgical goal. The best results with fewer hyperopic overcorrections were found in 5 methods that comprise a new consensus group: Geggel-real, Shammas no-history, Savini, Latkany flat, and Seitz Hoffer. The consensus group had 96% of eyes within -1.0/+0.5 D of the surgical goal. CONCLUSIONS: The Geggel-real method is a new approach requiring no historical data to determine IOL power in this ever-enlarging and challenging group of former refractive surgery patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

PMID: 19371955 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Technorati Tags:

Last updated Monday, June 22, 2009

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :

Materials presented in this website are for informational purposes only and are not medical advice. See full Terms of Use.
Unless otherwise indicated, Copyright 1997-2009 © Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization.
8543 Everglade Drive, Sacramento CA 95826-3616, USA, 800/USA-Eyes
No images, graphics, or text may be reproduced in any media without express written permission.
USAEyes, CRSQA, ComplicatedEyes, Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance,
50 Tough Questions For Your Lasik Doctor, and Consider and Choose With Confidence are trademarks of the
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
All Rights Reserved.