USAEyes Lasik grant application.
 
How to Choose
A Lasik Doctor
Find Certified Surgeon
50 Tough Lasik Questions
 
Ask Lasik Expert
Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
What is Lasik?
Lasik Cost
Lasik Results
Wavefront Custom iLasik
Bladeless Lasik
Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
Monovision Lasik
PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
RLE Lens Exchange
 
Lasik Groupon
$1,500 Off Lasik
 
 

Image of Lasik doctors certification logo.

 
 
This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.   The USAEyes.org website complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
 
 

Regression

After Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, and Epi-Lasik.


Image of two arrows pointing in a circular fashion at each other.  
Regression may cause a loss of some of the effects of refractive surgery.  
   

Moderate regression may occur after excimer laser assisted conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, LASEK, and Epi-Lasik. This occurs mostly in myopic patients who have more than 6.0 diopters of refractive error and virtually all hyperopic patients.

After excimer laser assisted refractive surgery the cornea tends to regress back toward the original refractive error. The epithelium and the deeper stroma can reshape and reform at different rates and can cause regression.

Most Lasik and Bladeless Lasik patients experience regression within the first few weeks after surgery, while the surface ablation techniques of PRK, LASEK, and Epi-Lasik may require additional time until regression has settled down. For myopic patients, regression usually occurs within the first one to three months after surgery. Hyperopic patients may experience regression for a longer period of time. In all cases, it is reasonable to expect regression to stop within the normal six month healing period.

Regression that is severe or continues to progress may be a sign of ectasia.

Regression is a natural component of the healing process and is considered in the planned correction. A patient may be deliberately overcorrect to accommodate expected levels of regression. See Lasik Overcorrection.

Regression occurs more commonly with smaller ablation diameters and with abrupt transition zones at the edge of the treatment areas. Steroid medications can be used to regulate and control regression. Although regression seems to be more prevalent the higher the refractive error, regression can occur in anyone.

Looking For Best Lasik Surgeon?

If you are ready to choose a doctor to be evaluated for conventional or custom wavefront Lasik, Bladeless Lasik, PRK, or any refractive surgery procedure, we recommend you consider a doctor who has been evaluated and certified by the USAEyes nonprofit organization. Locate a USAEyes Evaluated & Certified Lasik Doctor.

Personalized Answers

If this article did not fully answer your questions, use our free Ask Lasik Expert patient forum.


Recent Lasik Regression Medical Journal Articles...

Related Articles

Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 May 8;

Authors: Lee K, Ahn JM, Kim EK, Kim TI

Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare optical quality, ocular scattering, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A total of 47 eyes from 47 participants who had undergone LASIK (group I) or LASEK (group II) procedure at least 6 months prior were enrolled. Ocular aberrations and modulation transfer function (MTF) values measured using iTrace, a ray-tracing type aberrometer, were compared to MTF (modulation transfer function) cut-off values, Strehl ratio, and objective indices of scattering obtained using the Objective Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II). RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the postoperative optical quality parameters and the HOAs between both groups. In group I, the MTF cut-off value was significantly correlated with cylinder refraction (p = 0.037), and the objective scattering index (OSI) was positively correlated with spherical equivalent (p = 0.023). In group II, there was a statistically significant correlation between the OSI and achieved refractive correction (p = 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the OSI was the most significant predictor of MTF cut-off values after refractive surgery. Additionally, MTF values measured by OQAS were significantly lower than those measured by iTrace without correlation. CONCLUSION: Optical quality after refractive surgery may be influenced by not only ocular aberrations but also by scattering. Even though the accuracies of the machines used in this study to measure optical quality have yet to be proven, this study showed limited correlation among the values measured using the two different machines after refractive surgery. Therefore, for more generalized evaluation of visual function after refractive surgery, more advanced optical devices still need to be developed.

PMID: 23652467 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

 


Last updated

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :